Research · Singapore jewellery
We analyzed how ChatGPT and DeepSeek recommend gold jewellery brands in Singapore
We asked the AI models behind ChatGPT and DeepSeek where to buy jewellery in Singapore, 139 answers' worth. One brand showed up almost every time and was never the first pick. Here's who was, and what we'd do about it.
Ask an AI assistant where to buy a wedding ring in Singapore and you'll get a confident, tidy list. We wanted to know who's on that list, so we asked. Not once: 139 times, across the OpenAI and DeepSeek models, with the kinds of questions real shoppers type. First-time ring buyers. People saving in gold. Families planning a wedding set.
SK Jewellery was named in 97% of those answers. If you ran marketing there, you'd probably take that number and go home happy. But being named and being chosen turn out to be very different things, and the gap between them is where the work is.
AI has a shortlist of Singapore jewellers, and it's short
We tracked nine jewellers. Three of them, POH HENG, SK Jewellery and Goldheart, are in almost every answer. TAKA is a coin flip. Tomei turned up twice.
Who AI names when you ask where to buy jewellery in Singapore
| Jeweller | Answers naming it | Share |
|---|---|---|
| POH HENG | 139 of 139 | 100.0% |
| SK Jewellery | 135 of 139 | 97.1% |
| Goldheart | 134 of 139 | 96.4% |
| TAKA Jewellery | 76 of 139 | 54.7% |
| Tomei | 2 of 139 | 1.4% |
| Poh Kong | 0 of 139 | 0.0% |
| Clock Tower | 0 of 139 | 0.0% |
| Pandora | 0 of 139 | 0.0% |
| Swarovski | 0 of 139 | 0.0% |
Then there are the zeros. Poh Kong, Clock Tower, Pandora and Swarovski didn't appear in a single answer. These aren't obscure names. Pandora and Swarovski have stores in the same malls. But when a shopper asks an AI where to buy jewellery in Singapore, they simply aren't part of the conversation.
The two models mostly agreed, too. DeepSeek named SK every time; the OpenAI model did in 94% of its answers. This isn't one model's quirk.
What this means for you. Before you worry about what AI says about you, check whether it says your name at all. For four well-known brands here, the answer is no, and no amount of clever messaging fixes absence.
Being named isn't the same as being picked
Here's where SK's good news gets complicated. Named in 97% of answers. Actively recommended in 72%. And when we asked for a ranked top five, 140 shortlists in all, SK made the list about six times in ten and was never the first pick.
Named, recommended, ranked first: where SK Jewellery drops off
| Step | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Named | 135 of 139 | 97.1% |
| Recommended | 100 of 139 | 71.9% |
| Ranked first | 0 of 140 | 0.0% |
When SK does appear, it's usually near the bottom of the list, described as a sensible place to compare: mall stores, modern designs, 999 gold. All true, all pleasant, none of it a reason to go there first.
Singapore-based retailer known for 999 pure gold jewellery as well as diamond and bridal pieces, good to compare if gold jewellery is also a priority.
What this means for you. Track three numbers, not one: how often you're named, how often you're recommended, and how often you're first. Most brand dashboards stop at the first.
AI sends ring buyers and gold savers somewhere else
So who gets the top spot? It depends entirely on what the shopper wants, and in each case AI has a clear favourite.
AI's first pick, by what the shopper wants
| Shopping need | Brand | First-place picks |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement ring | Love & Co. | 29 of 50 |
| Engagement ring | JannPaul | 20 of 50 |
| Engagement ring | POH HENG | 1 of 50 |
| Gold as savings | BullionStar | 27 of 50 |
| Gold as savings | UOB | 13 of 50 |
| Gold as savings | POH HENG | 10 of 50 |
| Wedding and heritage gold | POH HENG | 25 of 40 |
| Wedding and heritage gold | Foundation Jewellers | 11 of 40 |
| Wedding and heritage gold | On Cheong Jewellery | 4 of 40 |
For engagement rings it's Love & Co. or JannPaul, 49 times out of 50. Love & Co. is SK's own sister brand, so the group isn't losing that shopper, but SK Jewellery itself isn't in the running. JannPaul wins on something specific: the AI keeps praising its diamond education and cut-quality detail.
For people buying gold as savings, AI barely recommends jewellers at all. BullionStar and UOB take four of every five first picks, because the model thinks a saver wants live prices, tight spreads and buyback, and it says so. For wedding sets and Peranakan gold, POH HENG leads comfortably.
Singapore-based bullion dealer with transparent live pricing, buyback options, and vault storage; well-suited to gold-as-savings buyers seeking physical bullion.
What this means for you. AI doesn't rank brands in general. It ranks them for a need. Find the two or three needs you should own, then look at exactly what AI praises the current winner for. That's your brief.
AI knows what SK sells. It doesn't know why you'd choose it
We looked at what AI actually says when it mentions SK. The picture is consistent: contemporary designs, 999 pure gold, mall stores, good for gifting. Accurate, and completely generic.
The reasons to choose SK that AI almost never gives
| What AI could have said | Answers | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Buyback policy | 13 of 135 | 9.6% |
| Trade-in and upgrade value | 9 of 135 | 6.7% |
| Gold purity assurance | 4 of 135 | 3.0% |
| Daily gold price | 2 of 135 | 1.5% |
| Wedding set pricing | 2 of 135 | 1.5% |
| Certified diamonds | 1 of 135 | 0.7% |
| Trusted family jeweller | 0 of 135 | 0.0% |
| Peranakan gold designs | 0 of 135 | 0.0% |
Now look at what it almost never says. Buyback came up in about one in ten mentions. Trade-in and upgrade value, 7%. Certified diamonds, once. Daily gold price, twice. Trusted family jeweller, never. These are the things shoppers in this category ask about before they hand over money, and AI doesn't connect any of them to SK.
What this means for you. Write down the five reasons someone should choose you. Then check whether AI ever gives those reasons. The gap between your list and AI's list is your content plan.
We tried one fix. It barely moved anything, and that's useful
SK's website says its gemstones are ethically sourced. AI never mentions it. So we ran an experiment: take AI's own description of SK, add a short ethical-sourcing line, hand each version to the model as background, and ask for shortlists again.
All diamonds, gemstones, and gold used in our jewellery are sourced ethically and purchased from legitimate sources.
The shortlist didn't budge: SK made the top five 63% of the time before and 61% after. Still never first.
We also wanted to know how shoppers might take it. So we had the model role-play six kinds of jewellery buyer, from a first-time ring shopper to a retiree buying gifts, and react to each version in their own words. Then we scored how interested each reaction sounded, out of five. Overall interest went from 3.20 to 3.24. A nudge, not a shift.
One added line, six kinds of buyer: who warmed up and who didn't
| Buyer | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| First fine-jewellery purchase | 3.24 | 3.24 | −0.00 |
| Engagement ring shortlister | 3.14 | 3.18 | +0.04 |
| Gold saver | 3.19 | 3.32 | +0.13 |
| Anniversary diamond upgrade | 3.32 | 3.40 | +0.08 |
| Parent buying wedding gold | 3.08 | 3.06 | −0.02 |
| Retiree buying gifts | 3.22 | 3.22 | +0.00 |
The breakdown is more interesting than the average. The gold saver and the anniversary-upgrade buyer warmed up the most. The parent buying wedding gold cooled slightly. But read what they said and one thing jumps out: nobody talked about sourcing. They asked for today's gold price, workmanship charges, buyback terms, grading certificates.
As someone buying mainly for savings, my next step would still depend on the day’s gold price, workmanship charges, and their buyback terms.
What this means for you. A values message on its own won't move you up an AI shortlist. Pair it with the specifics that buyer is already asking for, and test the pairing before you rewrite the website.
Ask the same question two ways and you get two answers
One last thing, and it matters for anyone pasting an AI answer into a slide. We asked about engagement rings in several slightly different ways. With “places to consider”, SK appeared in two of five shortlists before our change and none after. With “rank the leading spots”, it went the other way: none before, two after.
Same shopper, different wording, different shortlist
| Shopping question | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Ring buyer · places to trust | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Gold saver · places to consider | 2 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Gold saver · places to trust | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Ring buyer · places to consider | 2 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Ring buyer · rank the leading spots | 0 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Ring buyer · would seriously visit | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Gold saver · rank the leading spots | 2 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Wedding set · rank the leading spots | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Wedding set · would seriously visit | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Peranakan bride · rank the leading spots | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Peranakan bride · would seriously visit | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Ring buyer · best places | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Gold saver · best places | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Gold saver · would seriously visit | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 |
Same shopper, same need, same brand. The wording of the question moved the result more than our message did. That's why we ask every question five times and ask it several ways. A single AI answer is an anecdote.
What this means for you. Never judge your AI visibility from one prompt. If an agency shows you a single screenshot, ask how many times they ran it.
If I ran marketing at SK Jewellery
You already have the hard part: AI knows who you are. The job now is giving it reasons to put you first. Three things I'd do, in this order.
Own one need before you chase them all
Pick the shopper you most want, say the gold saver, and build the page AI is looking for: purity, today's price, workmanship charges and buyback terms, all in one place and kept current. Right now AI sends that shopper to a bullion dealer because the dealer answers those questions and you don't.
Turn your proof points into things AI can repeat
Buyback, trade-in, certified diamonds: if they're real strengths, write them down plainly, with specifics, where AI models can find them. “Trusted family jeweller” showing up zero times tells you the story you tell in-store isn't making it online.
Use sourcing as backup, not the headline
Ethical sourcing is worth saying. But our test suggests it reassures rather than persuades. Put it beside the certificate and the price, not instead of them, and test the pairing before you roll it out.
How we did this
We wrote 45 shopper questions about buying jewellery in Singapore and put each one to the OpenAI model that powers ChatGPT and to DeepSeek's model, through their APIs rather than the chat apps, five times each, on 19 September 2026. That's 450 answers. The 97% figure comes from the 139 answers to questions that didn't name any brand, so every mention is one the AI volunteered.
For the shortlist test, we gave the OpenAI model 14 shopping questions, five times each, with one of two descriptions of SK as background, and asked for a ranked top five each time: 140 shortlists.
For the buyer reactions, the same model played six shopper characters, five times per version. Those reactions are the model in character, not interviews with real customers. They are good for spotting what a message leaves unanswered, not for forecasting sales. We score them with a method published by independent researchers (arXiv:2510.08338).
Read the method · Download the full data
Logos and brand names belong to their owners and appear here only to identify the brands discussed.