Research · Singapore jewellery

We analyzed how ChatGPT and DeepSeek recommend gold jewellery brands in Singapore

We asked the AI models behind ChatGPT and DeepSeek where to buy jewellery in Singapore, 139 answers' worth. One brand showed up almost every time and was never the first pick. Here's who was, and what we'd do about it.

Ask an AI assistant where to buy a wedding ring in Singapore and you'll get a confident, tidy list. We wanted to know who's on that list, so we asked. Not once: 139 times, across the OpenAI and DeepSeek models, with the kinds of questions real shoppers type. First-time ring buyers. People saving in gold. Families planning a wedding set.

SK Jewellery was named in 97% of those answers. If you ran marketing there, you'd probably take that number and go home happy. But being named and being chosen turn out to be very different things, and the gap between them is where the work is.

AI has a shortlist of Singapore jewellers, and it's short

We tracked nine jewellers. Three of them, POH HENG, SK Jewellery and Goldheart, are in almost every answer. TAKA is a coin flip. Tomei turned up twice.

Who AI names when you ask where to buy jewellery in Singapore

Who AI names when you ask where to buy jewellery in Singapore
JewellerAnswers naming itShare
POH HENG139 of 139100.0%
SK Jewellery135 of 13997.1%
Goldheart134 of 13996.4%
TAKA Jewellery76 of 13954.7%
Tomei2 of 1391.4%
Poh Kong0 of 1390.0%
Clock Tower0 of 1390.0%
Pandora0 of 1390.0%
Swarovski0 of 1390.0%
Share of 139 AI answers that named each jeweller, without the question naming any brand. Save chart

Then there are the zeros. Poh Kong, Clock Tower, Pandora and Swarovski didn't appear in a single answer. These aren't obscure names. Pandora and Swarovski have stores in the same malls. But when a shopper asks an AI where to buy jewellery in Singapore, they simply aren't part of the conversation.

The two models mostly agreed, too. DeepSeek named SK every time; the OpenAI model did in 94% of its answers. This isn't one model's quirk.

What this means for you. Before you worry about what AI says about you, check whether it says your name at all. For four well-known brands here, the answer is no, and no amount of clever messaging fixes absence.

Being named isn't the same as being picked

Here's where SK's good news gets complicated. Named in 97% of answers. Actively recommended in 72%. And when we asked for a ranked top five, 140 shortlists in all, SK made the list about six times in ten and was never the first pick.

Named, recommended, ranked first: where SK Jewellery drops off

Named, recommended, ranked first: where SK Jewellery drops off
StepCountShare
Named135 of 13997.1%
Recommended100 of 13971.9%
Ranked first0 of 1400.0%
SK Jewellery across 139 open answers and 140 ranked shortlists. Save chart

When SK does appear, it's usually near the bottom of the list, described as a sensible place to compare: mall stores, modern designs, 999 gold. All true, all pleasant, none of it a reason to go there first.

Singapore-based retailer known for 999 pure gold jewellery as well as diamond and bridal pieces, good to compare if gold jewellery is also a priority.

How the OpenAI model described SK in a ring buyer's shortlist

What this means for you. Track three numbers, not one: how often you're named, how often you're recommended, and how often you're first. Most brand dashboards stop at the first.

AI sends ring buyers and gold savers somewhere else

So who gets the top spot? It depends entirely on what the shopper wants, and in each case AI has a clear favourite.

AI's first pick, by what the shopper wants

AI's first pick, by what the shopper wants
Shopping needBrandFirst-place picks
Engagement ringLove & Co.29 of 50
Engagement ringJannPaul20 of 50
Engagement ringPOH HENG1 of 50
Gold as savingsBullionStar27 of 50
Gold as savingsUOB13 of 50
Gold as savingsPOH HENG10 of 50
Wedding and heritage goldPOH HENG25 of 40
Wedding and heritage goldFoundation Jewellers11 of 40
Wedding and heritage goldOn Cheong Jewellery4 of 40
Share of ranked shortlists where each brand came first. SK Jewellery came first in none. Save chart

For engagement rings it's Love & Co. or JannPaul, 49 times out of 50. Love & Co. is SK's own sister brand, so the group isn't losing that shopper, but SK Jewellery itself isn't in the running. JannPaul wins on something specific: the AI keeps praising its diamond education and cut-quality detail.

For people buying gold as savings, AI barely recommends jewellers at all. BullionStar and UOB take four of every five first picks, because the model thinks a saver wants live prices, tight spreads and buyback, and it says so. For wedding sets and Peranakan gold, POH HENG leads comfortably.

Singapore-based bullion dealer with transparent live pricing, buyback options, and vault storage; well-suited to gold-as-savings buyers seeking physical bullion.

The OpenAI model on why BullionStar ranks first for gold savers

What this means for you. AI doesn't rank brands in general. It ranks them for a need. Find the two or three needs you should own, then look at exactly what AI praises the current winner for. That's your brief.

AI knows what SK sells. It doesn't know why you'd choose it

We looked at what AI actually says when it mentions SK. The picture is consistent: contemporary designs, 999 pure gold, mall stores, good for gifting. Accurate, and completely generic.

The reasons to choose SK that AI almost never gives

The reasons to choose SK that AI almost never gives
What AI could have saidAnswersShare
Buyback policy13 of 1359.6%
Trade-in and upgrade value9 of 1356.7%
Gold purity assurance4 of 1353.0%
Daily gold price2 of 1351.5%
Wedding set pricing2 of 1351.5%
Certified diamonds1 of 1350.7%
Trusted family jeweller0 of 1350.0%
Peranakan gold designs0 of 1350.0%
How often each selling point came up across the 135 answers that named SK Jewellery. Save chart

Now look at what it almost never says. Buyback came up in about one in ten mentions. Trade-in and upgrade value, 7%. Certified diamonds, once. Daily gold price, twice. Trusted family jeweller, never. These are the things shoppers in this category ask about before they hand over money, and AI doesn't connect any of them to SK.

What this means for you. Write down the five reasons someone should choose you. Then check whether AI ever gives those reasons. The gap between your list and AI's list is your content plan.

We tried one fix. It barely moved anything, and that's useful

SK's website says its gemstones are ethically sourced. AI never mentions it. So we ran an experiment: take AI's own description of SK, add a short ethical-sourcing line, hand each version to the model as background, and ask for shortlists again.

All diamonds, gemstones, and gold used in our jewellery are sourced ethically and purchased from legitimate sources.

The line we added

The shortlist didn't budge: SK made the top five 63% of the time before and 61% after. Still never first.

We also wanted to know how shoppers might take it. So we had the model role-play six kinds of jewellery buyer, from a first-time ring shopper to a retiree buying gifts, and react to each version in their own words. Then we scored how interested each reaction sounded, out of five. Overall interest went from 3.20 to 3.24. A nudge, not a shift.

One added line, six kinds of buyer: who warmed up and who didn't

One added line, six kinds of buyer: who warmed up and who didn't
BuyerBeforeAfterChange
First fine-jewellery purchase3.243.24−0.00
Engagement ring shortlister3.143.18+0.04
Gold saver3.193.32+0.13
Anniversary diamond upgrade3.323.40+0.08
Parent buying wedding gold3.083.06−0.02
Retiree buying gifts3.223.22+0.00
How interested each role-played buyer sounded before and after the sourcing line was added. Save chart

The breakdown is more interesting than the average. The gold saver and the anniversary-upgrade buyer warmed up the most. The parent buying wedding gold cooled slightly. But read what they said and one thing jumps out: nobody talked about sourcing. They asked for today's gold price, workmanship charges, buyback terms, grading certificates.

As someone buying mainly for savings, my next step would still depend on the day’s gold price, workmanship charges, and their buyback terms.

The gold-saver character, reacting to the new version

What this means for you. A values message on its own won't move you up an AI shortlist. Pair it with the specifics that buyer is already asking for, and test the pairing before you rewrite the website.

Ask the same question two ways and you get two answers

One last thing, and it matters for anyone pasting an AI answer into a slide. We asked about engagement rings in several slightly different ways. With “places to consider”, SK appeared in two of five shortlists before our change and none after. With “rank the leading spots”, it went the other way: none before, two after.

Same shopper, different wording, different shortlist

Same shopper, different wording, different shortlist
Shopping questionBeforeAfter
Ring buyer · places to trust5 of 55 of 5
Gold saver · places to consider2 of 53 of 5
Gold saver · places to trust5 of 55 of 5
Ring buyer · places to consider2 of 50 of 5
Ring buyer · rank the leading spots0 of 52 of 5
Ring buyer · would seriously visit3 of 54 of 5
Gold saver · rank the leading spots2 of 50 of 5
Wedding set · rank the leading spots5 of 55 of 5
Wedding set · would seriously visit5 of 55 of 5
Peranakan bride · rank the leading spots5 of 55 of 5
Peranakan bride · would seriously visit5 of 55 of 5
Ring buyer · best places3 of 53 of 5
Gold saver · best places1 of 50 of 5
Gold saver · would seriously visit1 of 51 of 5
How many of five shortlists included SK Jewellery for each of the 14 shopping questions, before and after the added line. Save chart

Same shopper, same need, same brand. The wording of the question moved the result more than our message did. That's why we ask every question five times and ask it several ways. A single AI answer is an anecdote.

What this means for you. Never judge your AI visibility from one prompt. If an agency shows you a single screenshot, ask how many times they ran it.

If I ran marketing at SK Jewellery

You already have the hard part: AI knows who you are. The job now is giving it reasons to put you first. Three things I'd do, in this order.

  1. Own one need before you chase them all

    Pick the shopper you most want, say the gold saver, and build the page AI is looking for: purity, today's price, workmanship charges and buyback terms, all in one place and kept current. Right now AI sends that shopper to a bullion dealer because the dealer answers those questions and you don't.

  2. Turn your proof points into things AI can repeat

    Buyback, trade-in, certified diamonds: if they're real strengths, write them down plainly, with specifics, where AI models can find them. “Trusted family jeweller” showing up zero times tells you the story you tell in-store isn't making it online.

  3. Use sourcing as backup, not the headline

    Ethical sourcing is worth saying. But our test suggests it reassures rather than persuades. Put it beside the certificate and the price, not instead of them, and test the pairing before you roll it out.

How we did this

We wrote 45 shopper questions about buying jewellery in Singapore and put each one to the OpenAI model that powers ChatGPT and to DeepSeek's model, through their APIs rather than the chat apps, five times each, on 19 September 2026. That's 450 answers. The 97% figure comes from the 139 answers to questions that didn't name any brand, so every mention is one the AI volunteered.

For the shortlist test, we gave the OpenAI model 14 shopping questions, five times each, with one of two descriptions of SK as background, and asked for a ranked top five each time: 140 shortlists.

For the buyer reactions, the same model played six shopper characters, five times per version. Those reactions are the model in character, not interviews with real customers. They are good for spotting what a message leaves unanswered, not for forecasting sales. We score them with a method published by independent researchers (arXiv:2510.08338).

Read the method · Download the full data

Logos and brand names belong to their owners and appear here only to identify the brands discussed.